Skip to main content

Peter Lindbergh

1.  I enjoy looking at Lindbergh's work, and appreciate his goal to portray women naturally, without the weight of oppressive beauty standards. While I don't believe that he fully did this, as most of his models still follow the conventional standards of beauty (skinny, some wearing makeup, little wrinkles, etc.), I believe that it is significantly better than other works which push for harmful practices and imagery.Emma Watson - Portrait by Peter Lindbergh | FacebookVOGUE AUSTRALIA: Emma Watson by Peter Lindbergh | Image Amplified


2. I would categorize Lindbergh's work as ethical editorial photography, as he works for mainstream media, but is careful not to confine his subjects, particularly women, to the media's strict expectations/definitions of women.

A Look at 40 Years of Peter Lindbergh's Luscious Portrait and Fashion | Vanity Fair

3. Both Peter Lindbergh and Damien Baker try to capture their subjects in an honest manner. The difference between them seems to be that Lindbergh takes a step back to observe the bigger picture of how the world views women, and how he can change that perspective for the better. Baker's photographs, on the other hand, seem to be more intimate and heavily influenced by the pain and struggles he has experienced. He sees himself in the poses, emotions, facial expressions, angles, etc of his photos and subjects. Both are very beautiful, and while I believe Lindbergh's purpose is more important, I enjoy Baker's work more because it is more visually interesting to me.Peter Lindbergh's fight to free women from 'the terror of youth and perfection' | CNNMonday - News - DAMON BAKER ยท SADIE SINK

Lindbergh                                                                                              Baker

4. If someone were to remake Lindbergh's work, it would be more daring and they would take more risks with it. They wouldn't be afraid to experiment with all aspects of femininity from all different cultures. It could be portrayed through different clothes, poses, or environments/backgrounds, but it would maintain a level of clarity and simplicity that defines Lindbergh's original photographs.

Peter Lindbergh | Gagosian

5. I appreciate Lindbergh's purpose for the most part. While it doesn't sit right with me that a man is trying to redefine women for the mainstream, I believe he has good intentions. Plus, photographers who are women themselves can take inspiration from his work and purpose to portray women and femininity in a truly authentic light. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Kenna

 1. I immediately fell in love with Kenna's work when I first saw it, because it is simple and yet stark. I love the mysterious and sometimes a little spooky energy it has due to the shots being in black and white. His work has a peaceful, almost nostalgic energy due to the long exposure that makes it feel like the viewer has been suspended alone in time and space. 2. Michael Kenna is a monochromatic landscape photographer. He often finds simple objects, natural and manmade, and captures them in a way that makes them stand out, despite (and perhaps because of) being in shades of gray, black, and white. 3. Michael Kenna and Ansel Adams both captured the beauty of black and white landscapes, utilizing the contrast between light and dark to emphasize certain elements of their photos. Adams gravitates towards impressive, sprawling landscapes in places like Yellowstone National Park, or Yosemite, while each of Kenna's photos tends to focus on one complete subject, like a tree, rathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Josef Sudek

1 . The work is calming and a little whimsical. In my opinion, it perfectly captures the calm after the storm and the beauty in abandonment/isolation. The shots have a beautiful, dark gray aesthetic, which I enjoy a lot. 2.  Sudek's work is classified as neo-romantic, but if I had to categorize it I would say it is melancholy life photography, just based on the gray tones, solitary objects, and places relatively void of bustling city life/people, etc. 3.  Fan Ho and Josef Sudek have some similar shots in the way they capture rays of soft sunlight filtering between buildings/architectural structures, as shown below. Sudek has less work featuring this motif, but Ho often focuses on that. Overall, I prefer Fan Ho, but between the photos shown below, I enjoy Sudek's more. 4. If someone made Sudek's work today, it would more heavily focus on ruination and abandonment, really honing in on the decline of our world in terms of the current conflicts and division we face globally. 5...
Post a Comment
Read more

David LaChapelle

1. The only way I can describe my initial reaction to LaChapelle's work is "weirded out". His work is of good quality and it's compositionally interesting, but it's incredibly bizarre, and just not the type of art I typically enjoy. 2. David LaChapelle is a commercial photographer because he photographs mainly celebrities for magazines to promote their image and allow the magazine to profit. 3. Marino Testino's portraits of celebrities are very tame compared to LaChapelle's. He has also worked for popular magazines such as Vogue and Vanity Fair, but his images follow the mainstream: they capture celebrities in all their glory and glamour, perhaps adding a bold feauture or two. LaChapelle, on the other hand, magnifies the bold features and makes them the theme of his work. I'm not a huge fan of either of their works, but I don't hate them, either. There is clear craftsmanship involved for each, and I respect that, even if LaChapelle's is a litt...
Post a Comment
Read more