Skip to main content

Francesca Woodman

1. I was both spooked and impressed by Woodman's work. The majority of her pictures feature naked women in motion or blurred and merging with their surroundings. They seem melancholy and haunted, and that vulnerability seems to reflect Woodman's own state of mind.


Francesca Woodman' at Guggenheim Museum - The New York Times
2. I would categorize Woodman's work as storytelling female portraiture photography, because it isn't just a basic commercial headshot. Woodman poses her models with intention, and uses props, empty space, shapes/angles, to piece together a cohesive narrative with a purpose that is open for interpretation.

3. Although it is not photography, some of Woodman's work reminds me of the short story The Yellow Wallpaper, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. It follows the story of a woman trapped within the cult of domesticity, which is represented by the yellow wallpaper in her room that she is metaphorically trapped within. Some of Woodman's photos capture women who are literally trapped behind ripped wallpaper that they are seemingly trying to escape from. My interpretation of these photos is similar to that of Gilman's novella: both works feature women who feel trapped by their circumstances. Those circumstances in terms of Woodman's work could be many things, but it seems to me that she is struggling with issues in mental health due to the pressures women faced in her current society. I like both works, but I prefer Woodman's, as it is visual and interesting to look at.The Yellow Wallpaper by mimsytrove on DeviantArtFrancesca Woodman | Gagosian

4. If someone remade Woodman's work today, it would more openly portray women's freedom, rather than vulnerable, haunted, sad women who are only in motion in confined spaces, alone.

Francesca Woodman's Haunting Self-Portraits Redefined Photography | Artsy

5. I love the quote at the end of the slideshow, because I think it perfectly sums up the concept of perception. No matter how long or hard we interpret and analyze an artist's work, it will only end up being our personal interpretation. Everyone views themself and others' work differently based on their own experiences. Woodman's work is her own, but millions of different versions exist in the minds of her audience.
How Photographer Francesca Woodman Came Into Her Own in Italy | AnOther

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Kenna

 1. I immediately fell in love with Kenna's work when I first saw it, because it is simple and yet stark. I love the mysterious and sometimes a little spooky energy it has due to the shots being in black and white. His work has a peaceful, almost nostalgic energy due to the long exposure that makes it feel like the viewer has been suspended alone in time and space. 2. Michael Kenna is a monochromatic landscape photographer. He often finds simple objects, natural and manmade, and captures them in a way that makes them stand out, despite (and perhaps because of) being in shades of gray, black, and white. 3. Michael Kenna and Ansel Adams both captured the beauty of black and white landscapes, utilizing the contrast between light and dark to emphasize certain elements of their photos. Adams gravitates towards impressive, sprawling landscapes in places like Yellowstone National Park, or Yosemite, while each of Kenna's photos tends to focus on one complete subject, like a tree, rathe...

Josef Sudek

1 . The work is calming and a little whimsical. In my opinion, it perfectly captures the calm after the storm and the beauty in abandonment/isolation. The shots have a beautiful, dark gray aesthetic, which I enjoy a lot. 2.  Sudek's work is classified as neo-romantic, but if I had to categorize it I would say it is melancholy life photography, just based on the gray tones, solitary objects, and places relatively void of bustling city life/people, etc. 3.  Fan Ho and Josef Sudek have some similar shots in the way they capture rays of soft sunlight filtering between buildings/architectural structures, as shown below. Sudek has less work featuring this motif, but Ho often focuses on that. Overall, I prefer Fan Ho, but between the photos shown below, I enjoy Sudek's more. 4. If someone made Sudek's work today, it would more heavily focus on ruination and abandonment, really honing in on the decline of our world in terms of the current conflicts and division we face globally. 5...

David LaChapelle

1. The only way I can describe my initial reaction to LaChapelle's work is "weirded out". His work is of good quality and it's compositionally interesting, but it's incredibly bizarre, and just not the type of art I typically enjoy. 2. David LaChapelle is a commercial photographer because he photographs mainly celebrities for magazines to promote their image and allow the magazine to profit. 3. Marino Testino's portraits of celebrities are very tame compared to LaChapelle's. He has also worked for popular magazines such as Vogue and Vanity Fair, but his images follow the mainstream: they capture celebrities in all their glory and glamour, perhaps adding a bold feauture or two. LaChapelle, on the other hand, magnifies the bold features and makes them the theme of his work. I'm not a huge fan of either of their works, but I don't hate them, either. There is clear craftsmanship involved for each, and I respect that, even if LaChapelle's is a litt...