Skip to main content

Jerry Uelsmann

1. Initially, I was very impressed but also confused as to how Uelsmann got to the final products, as his photographs have other images layered within them. To be able to achieve this "photomontage" without Photoshop must have taken a lot of hard work and creativity, which I admire. The images themselves range from astounding to unsettling, but overall I like them.


Jerry Uelsmann: A Celebration of His Life and Art - Harn Museum of Art

2. I would categorize Jerry Uelsmann's work as photomontage photography, typically contrasting a landscape/natural image with a human/manmade subject.
Jerry Uelsmann
3. El Lissitzsky was a Russian artist, designer, and photographer who, like Uelsmann, utilized the technique of creating a photomontage, resulting in fascinating layered images. However, Lissitzsky's images focus more on humans, whereas Uelsmann's do not, and if they do, the person is much smaller in the frame, largely trumped by their natural surroundings. I like both of their works, but overall I prefer Lissitzsky's due to its more intimate, personal energy. Looking at his photos feels like a message/commentary has been received successfully by the viewer, but Uelsmann's message feels distant, or even nonexistent.

El Lissitzky - Photographs London Lot 75 May 2012 | PhillipsJerry Uelsmann | Untitled 1969 (Floating Tree) (1969) | Available for Sale  | Artsy

4. If someone remade Uelsmann's work today, they would utilize his signature contrast between man and nature, but use it to provide social commentary, on issues like climate change or urban decay.Jerry Uelsmann, Surreal Image-Maker, Dies at 87 - The New York Times

5. Uelsmann's work embodies his quote perfectly, as he explored the world of photography in a way that not many had before. By giving himself permission to be creative, and even a little weird, his photographs were all the better for it.

Interview with Jerry Uelsmann: Invented Realities — Musée Magazine

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Kenna

 1. I immediately fell in love with Kenna's work when I first saw it, because it is simple and yet stark. I love the mysterious and sometimes a little spooky energy it has due to the shots being in black and white. His work has a peaceful, almost nostalgic energy due to the long exposure that makes it feel like the viewer has been suspended alone in time and space. 2. Michael Kenna is a monochromatic landscape photographer. He often finds simple objects, natural and manmade, and captures them in a way that makes them stand out, despite (and perhaps because of) being in shades of gray, black, and white. 3. Michael Kenna and Ansel Adams both captured the beauty of black and white landscapes, utilizing the contrast between light and dark to emphasize certain elements of their photos. Adams gravitates towards impressive, sprawling landscapes in places like Yellowstone National Park, or Yosemite, while each of Kenna's photos tends to focus on one complete subject, like a tree, rathe...

Josef Sudek

1 . The work is calming and a little whimsical. In my opinion, it perfectly captures the calm after the storm and the beauty in abandonment/isolation. The shots have a beautiful, dark gray aesthetic, which I enjoy a lot. 2.  Sudek's work is classified as neo-romantic, but if I had to categorize it I would say it is melancholy life photography, just based on the gray tones, solitary objects, and places relatively void of bustling city life/people, etc. 3.  Fan Ho and Josef Sudek have some similar shots in the way they capture rays of soft sunlight filtering between buildings/architectural structures, as shown below. Sudek has less work featuring this motif, but Ho often focuses on that. Overall, I prefer Fan Ho, but between the photos shown below, I enjoy Sudek's more. 4. If someone made Sudek's work today, it would more heavily focus on ruination and abandonment, really honing in on the decline of our world in terms of the current conflicts and division we face globally. 5...

Steve McCurry

1. My initial reaction to McCurry's work was awe at how vibrant each photograph is, and how vividly I could sense/feel the emotions portrayed by his subjects.  2. I would categorize McCurry's work as multicultural humanist photography, as he mainly captures people of all different backgrounds and their struggles/the culture that is retained within them even throughout conflict.  3. Henri Cartier-Bresson is also a humanist photographer, but I prefer McCurry's work more, due to his stunning use of vibrant colors, adding to his cultural themes. Bresson's work is mainly French street photography, therefore it misses out on capturing the beauty and pain of other cultures. 4. I honestly love McCurry's work, and I can't think of any changes that would make it better. However, someone else might want to try more candid photography of unsuspecting subjects, instead of making the connection with the subjects first. I think it would be less respectful and successful that w...