Skip to main content

Jerry Uelsmann

1. Initially, I was very impressed but also confused as to how Uelsmann got to the final products, as his photographs have other images layered within them. To be able to achieve this "photomontage" without Photoshop must have taken a lot of hard work and creativity, which I admire. The images themselves range from astounding to unsettling, but overall I like them.


Jerry Uelsmann: A Celebration of His Life and Art - Harn Museum of Art

2. I would categorize Jerry Uelsmann's work as photomontage photography, typically contrasting a landscape/natural image with a human/manmade subject.
Jerry Uelsmann
3. El Lissitzsky was a Russian artist, designer, and photographer who, like Uelsmann, utilized the technique of creating a photomontage, resulting in fascinating layered images. However, Lissitzsky's images focus more on humans, whereas Uelsmann's do not, and if they do, the person is much smaller in the frame, largely trumped by their natural surroundings. I like both of their works, but overall I prefer Lissitzsky's due to its more intimate, personal energy. Looking at his photos feels like a message/commentary has been received successfully by the viewer, but Uelsmann's message feels distant, or even nonexistent.

El Lissitzky - Photographs London Lot 75 May 2012 | PhillipsJerry Uelsmann | Untitled 1969 (Floating Tree) (1969) | Available for Sale | Artsy

4. If someone remade Uelsmann's work today, they would utilize his signature contrast between man and nature, but use it to provide social commentary, on issues like climate change or urban decay.Jerry Uelsmann, Surreal Image-Maker, Dies at 87 - The New York Times

5. Uelsmann's work embodies his quote perfectly, as he explored the world of photography in a way that not many had before. By giving himself permission to be creative, and even a little weird, his photographs were all the better for it.

Interview with Jerry Uelsmann: Invented Realities — Musée Magazine

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anton Corbijn Reflection

 1. I was initially a bit surprised at Corbijn’s work, because it is unconventional in a way that made me feel  slightly uneasy. However, as I looked at more of his photos, I grew to appreciate the beauty in the oddity. 2. Since his work is slightly unorthodox, it’s hard to place in a specific category, but I would say most of his work fits among human portraits. 3. Damon Baker is a photographer of people, as Corbijn is, and they both manage to capture the life of the people in their shots. However, Corbijn tends to lean more on the gritty, raw, and frankly a bit odd, side of people, particularly celebrities’, personas, whereas Baker captures the glamorous angst of modern day celebrities. I like both of their works, and appreciate both for their raw quality. (Sadie Sink!) Baker                                  (David Bowie!) Corbijn 4. If someone tried to replicate Corbijn’s work today, i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Michael Kenna

 1. I immediately fell in love with Kenna's work when I first saw it, because it is simple and yet stark. I love the mysterious and sometimes a little spooky energy it has due to the shots being in black and white. His work has a peaceful, almost nostalgic energy due to the long exposure that makes it feel like the viewer has been suspended alone in time and space. 2. Michael Kenna is a monochromatic landscape photographer. He often finds simple objects, natural and manmade, and captures them in a way that makes them stand out, despite (and perhaps because of) being in shades of gray, black, and white. 3. Michael Kenna and Ansel Adams both captured the beauty of black and white landscapes, utilizing the contrast between light and dark to emphasize certain elements of their photos. Adams gravitates towards impressive, sprawling landscapes in places like Yellowstone National Park, or Yosemite, while each of Kenna's photos tends to focus on one complete subject, like a tree, rathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nick Knight

 1. Initially, I was mostly surprised and a little bit appalled by Knight's work. It is unique in a shocking way, because he is not afraid to use what I interpret as sci-fi or dystopian-like elements, whether they be prosthetics, editing, etc. 2. I would categorize Knight's photography as fashion surrealism, as he focuses on clothing/the style of his subjects, but does so in an unorthodox, often dreamlike and unnatural way. 3.  Commercial photographer David LaChapelle's work shocked me in a similar way to Knight's, as both photographers are fearless in their unorthodox depictions of subjects, often with maximalist style. The main difference I've spotted between their respective works is their backgrounds: LaChapelle draws attention to the backgrounds as well as the subjects by making them bright, unusual, or a contrast to the subject/s, while Knight solely focuses on his subjects, utilizing a plain, neutral background to make his subjects stand out. I respect their ...
Post a Comment
Read more