Gregory Crewdson

1. My initial reaction to Crewdson's photos was admiration of the lighting and cinematic style of the way he shoots, but as I continued to look through more of his photos, a sense of unease grew. This is due to the eery, surreal energy his work gives off because of the staged, artificial moments he captured, yet at the same time manage to be reflective of the human psyche. Gregory Crewdson captures the dark side of rural America | CNN

2. I would categorize Crewdson's work as cinematic photography, because it is all staged, but tries to be perceived as candid representations of human emotions, so it adds a hint of surrealism to it.

3. Helen Levitt is a candid photographer whose photos, at first glance, seem to be in stark contrast to Crewdson's. Hers mainly captured the everyday life of poor New Yorkers in the 30's and revealed the heart of people going about their day in a world without technology. Crewdson's, on the other hand, are captured through a cinematic, artificial, modern-day lens, and mostly depict the dark side of human emotions. There are some similarities between their respective works, in that they both strive to portray real, human emotions; it's just that how each approaches this objective is vastly different from the other. I prefer Levitt's work due to its general joy, lack of contemporary technology, and candid style.

Levitt: (my favorite photos of hers that I've seen so far)

Helen Levitt: Photographing the Heart of Old New York Helen Levitt - New York Street Photographer

4. If someone remade Crewdson's work now, I believe they would flip his theme of photographing humans interacting with nature that doesn't belong in a manmade setting, to humans interacting with technology overgrown in a natural setting. This would effectively reflect the massive, rapid growth of technology in our world today. I also believe his subjects would be more racially diverse, as everyone in the pictures I've seen appears to be white.

Gregory Crewdson | Untitled | The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation

5. I find it interesting that Crewdson refers to his work as "commonplace", because it appears as very much unnatural. However, this is just due to the composition; the lighting and staging may be artificial, but the content of his work is not. It reflects very real emotions and thoughts (the "psychological nature"), so I suppose that is what he means when he calls his photos "commonplace".

Comments

Anton Corbijn Reflection

1. I was initially a bit surprised at Corbijn’s work, because it is unconventional in a way that made me feel slightly uneasy. However, as I looked at more of his photos, I grew to appreciate the beauty in the oddity. 2. Since his work is slightly unorthodox, it’s hard to place in a specific category, but I would say most of his work fits among human portraits. 3. Damon Baker is a photographer of people, as Corbijn is, and they both manage to capture the life of the people in their shots. However, Corbijn tends to lean more on the gritty, raw, and frankly a bit odd, side of people, particularly celebrities’, personas, whereas Baker captures the glamorous angst of modern day celebrities. I like both of their works, and appreciate both for their raw quality. (Sadie Sink!) Baker (David Bowie!) Corbijn 4. If someone tried to replicate Corbijn’s work today, i...

Michael Kenna

1. I immediately fell in love with Kenna's work when I first saw it, because it is simple and yet stark. I love the mysterious and sometimes a little spooky energy it has due to the shots being in black and white. His work has a peaceful, almost nostalgic energy due to the long exposure that makes it feel like the viewer has been suspended alone in time and space. 2. Michael Kenna is a monochromatic landscape photographer. He often finds simple objects, natural and manmade, and captures them in a way that makes them stand out, despite (and perhaps because of) being in shades of gray, black, and white. 3. Michael Kenna and Ansel Adams both captured the beauty of black and white landscapes, utilizing the contrast between light and dark to emphasize certain elements of their photos. Adams gravitates towards impressive, sprawling landscapes in places like Yellowstone National Park, or Yosemite, while each of Kenna's photos tends to focus on one complete subject, like a tree, rathe...

Nick Knight

1. Initially, I was mostly surprised and a little bit appalled by Knight's work. It is unique in a shocking way, because he is not afraid to use what I interpret as sci-fi or dystopian-like elements, whether they be prosthetics, editing, etc. 2. I would categorize Knight's photography as fashion surrealism, as he focuses on clothing/the style of his subjects, but does so in an unorthodox, often dreamlike and unnatural way. 3. Commercial photographer David LaChapelle's work shocked me in a similar way to Knight's, as both photographers are fearless in their unorthodox depictions of subjects, often with maximalist style. The main difference I've spotted between their respective works is their backgrounds: LaChapelle draws attention to the backgrounds as well as the subjects by making them bright, unusual, or a contrast to the subject/s, while Knight solely focuses on his subjects, utilizing a plain, neutral background to make his subjects stand out. I respect their ...

Shown to the Stars

Search This Blog