Skip to main content

Gregory Crewdson

 1. My initial reaction to Crewdson's photos was admiration of the lighting and cinematic style of the way he shoots, but as I continued to look through more of his photos, a sense of unease grew. This is due to the eery, surreal energy his work gives off because of the staged, artificial moments he captured, yet at the same time manage to be reflective of the human psyche.Gregory Crewdson captures the dark side of rural America | CNN


2. I would categorize Crewdson's work as cinematic photography, because it is all staged, but tries to be perceived as candid representations of human emotions, so it adds a hint of surrealism to it.

3.  Helen Levitt is a candid photographer whose photos, at first glance, seem to be in stark contrast to Crewdson's. Hers mainly captured the everyday life of poor New Yorkers in the 30's and revealed the heart of people going about their day in a world without technology. Crewdson's, on the other hand, are captured through a cinematic, artificial, modern-day lens, and mostly depict the dark side of human emotions. There are some similarities between their respective works, in that they both strive to portray real, human emotions; it's just that how each approaches this objective is vastly different from the other. I prefer Levitt's work due to its general joy, lack of contemporary technology, and candid style.

Levitt: (my favorite photos of hers that I've seen so far)

Helen Levitt: Photographing the Heart of Old New YorkHelen Levitt - New York Street Photographer

4. If someone remade Crewdson's work now, I believe they would flip his theme of photographing humans interacting with nature that doesn't belong in a manmade setting, to humans interacting with technology overgrown in a natural setting. This would effectively reflect the massive, rapid growth of technology in our world today. I also believe his subjects would be more racially diverse, as everyone in the pictures I've seen appears to be white.


Gregory Crewdson | Untitled | The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation

5. I find it interesting that Crewdson refers to his work as "commonplace", because it appears as very much unnatural. However, this is just due to the composition; the lighting and staging may be artificial, but the content of his work is not. It reflects very real emotions and thoughts (the "psychological nature"), so I suppose that is what he means when he calls his photos "commonplace". 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pieter Hugo

 1.  My initial reaction was surprise and intrigue at the content of the photographs. It was jarring to see the subjects with monkeys and hyenas on leashes, and the devastation and anguish of the people and their surroundings, because it represents a culture so different from my own. However, at the same time, I really appreciate the composition, quality, and subject matter of Hugo's works. 2. I would categorize Hugo’s work as documentary portraiture because he places an emphasis on shocking images. He does so to reveal the horrors of post-Apartheid Africa to fuel social justice for the mistreatment of the subjects he photographs.  3.  Clifford Prince King also photographs solely black people, but King's and Hugo's photography styles are vastly different. King attempts to normalize the existence of queer black men through intimate photoshoots, often in a sexual but comfortable way, which is a form of social justice in itself. Hugo, on the other hand, leans into the c...
Post a Comment
Read more