Skip to main content

Fan Ho

 1.  Initially, I was in awe of Ho’s photos. I love the neutral beige and grey tones because it reminds me of nostalgic vintage photos. I also love that his subject matter is street life, and plays with the juxtaposition between dark and light that shows the distinction between architecture and humanity, like arches, straight lines, etc. that frame people.

2. Fan Ho’s work can be categorized as street photography because the majority of the settings he photographs are the streets.

3. Henri Cartier-Bresson was a humanist photographer with a knack for candid photography. While they both captured people on the streets, the people in Fan Ho's shots were often small in comparison to their surroundings, so more of the focus was on the street life they occupied. I enjoy Ho's work more than Cartier-Bresson's because it is more romanticized and comforting than Bresson's honest, unsettling work, and I prefer the shades and shapes of Ho's photos.


Henri Cartier-Bresson                                      Fan Ho

Henri Cartier-Bresson, San Francisco, California, USA, 1946 | Jackson Fine ArtFan Ho: Master of photography | The Independent Photographer

4. If someone made Ho's work today, it would be much more difficult to do so, and would likely be censored due to the extreme surveillance China's citizens are currently subjected to. If it were possible to share uncensored photos, the geometric shapes Ho used to frame his subjects would likely come off as much more compressed and oppressive to reflect the times.

5. I agree with Fan Ho's quote, "My belief in art creation is to try anything" because if he hadn't taken the bold step of experimentation with new forms of photography, it is unlikely that he would have been so successful in the creation of such beautiful photographs. This applies to other trailblazers in the arts as well; an artist's bravery to show their unique perspective to the world is what allows art to progress.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anton Corbijn Reflection

 1. I was initially a bit surprised at Corbijn’s work, because it is unconventional in a way that made me feel  slightly uneasy. However, as I looked at more of his photos, I grew to appreciate the beauty in the oddity. 2. Since his work is slightly unorthodox, it’s hard to place in a specific category, but I would say most of his work fits among human portraits. 3. Damon Baker is a photographer of people, as Corbijn is, and they both manage to capture the life of the people in their shots. However, Corbijn tends to lean more on the gritty, raw, and frankly a bit odd, side of people, particularly celebrities’, personas, whereas Baker captures the glamorous angst of modern day celebrities. I like both of their works, and appreciate both for their raw quality. (Sadie Sink!) Baker                                  (David Bowie!) Corbijn 4. If someone tried to replicate Corbijn’s work today, i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Michael Kenna

 1. I immediately fell in love with Kenna's work when I first saw it, because it is simple and yet stark. I love the mysterious and sometimes a little spooky energy it has due to the shots being in black and white. His work has a peaceful, almost nostalgic energy due to the long exposure that makes it feel like the viewer has been suspended alone in time and space. 2. Michael Kenna is a monochromatic landscape photographer. He often finds simple objects, natural and manmade, and captures them in a way that makes them stand out, despite (and perhaps because of) being in shades of gray, black, and white. 3. Michael Kenna and Ansel Adams both captured the beauty of black and white landscapes, utilizing the contrast between light and dark to emphasize certain elements of their photos. Adams gravitates towards impressive, sprawling landscapes in places like Yellowstone National Park, or Yosemite, while each of Kenna's photos tends to focus on one complete subject, like a tree, rathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nick Knight

 1. Initially, I was mostly surprised and a little bit appalled by Knight's work. It is unique in a shocking way, because he is not afraid to use what I interpret as sci-fi or dystopian-like elements, whether they be prosthetics, editing, etc. 2. I would categorize Knight's photography as fashion surrealism, as he focuses on clothing/the style of his subjects, but does so in an unorthodox, often dreamlike and unnatural way. 3.  Commercial photographer David LaChapelle's work shocked me in a similar way to Knight's, as both photographers are fearless in their unorthodox depictions of subjects, often with maximalist style. The main difference I've spotted between their respective works is their backgrounds: LaChapelle draws attention to the backgrounds as well as the subjects by making them bright, unusual, or a contrast to the subject/s, while Knight solely focuses on his subjects, utilizing a plain, neutral background to make his subjects stand out. I respect their ...
Post a Comment
Read more