Skip to main content

Anton Corbijn Reflection

 1. I was initially a bit surprised at Corbijn’s work, because it is unconventional in a way that made me feel  slightly uneasy. However, as I looked at more of his photos, I grew to appreciate the beauty in the oddity.

2. Since his work is slightly unorthodox, it’s hard to place in a specific category, but I would say most of his work fits among human portraits.

3. Damon Baker is a photographer of people, as Corbijn is, and they both manage to capture the life of the people in their shots. However, Corbijn tends to lean more on the gritty, raw, and frankly a bit odd, side of people, particularly celebrities’, personas, whereas Baker captures the glamorous angst of modern day celebrities. I like both of their works, and appreciate both for their raw quality.

- SADIE SINK Anton Corbijn | David Bowie, London (1993) | Available for Sale | Artsy

(Sadie Sink!) Baker                                  (David Bowie!) Corbijn

4. If someone tried to replicate Corbijn’s work today, it would incorporate more aspects of modern day technology as props that the models interact with, and perhaps would feel busier and more chaotic because of it. I believe it would still maintain its raw, exaggerated realism. 

5. I love the quote at the end of the slideshow because I agree with it wholeheartedly. Corbijn states that the realism in his photos stems from its imperfections; instead of getting down on himself because of his mistakes, he embraces them. This way of thinking is something that should be embraced itself.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gregory Crewdson

 1. My initial reaction to Crewdson's photos was admiration of the lighting and cinematic style of the way he shoots, but as I continued to look through more of his photos, a sense of unease grew. This is due to the eery, surreal energy his work gives off because of the staged, artificial moments he captured, yet at the same time manage to be reflective of the human psyche. 2. I would categorize Crewdson's work as cinematic photography, because it is all staged, but tries to be perceived as candid representations of human emotions, so it adds a hint of surrealism to it. 3.  Helen Levitt is a candid photographer whose photos, at first glance, seem to be in stark contrast to Crewdson's. Hers mainly captured the everyday life of poor New Yorkers in the 30's and revealed the heart of people going about their day in a world without technology. Crewdson's, on the other hand, are captured through a cinematic, artificial, modern-day lens, and mostly depict the dark side of ...